ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry identification of extracellular vesicle biomarkers for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Small Extracellular Vesicle-Associated Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor in Primary Liver Cancer: From Immunological Mediator to Oncogenic Driver and Biomarker.Cell proliferation · 2026Article
- Advances in protein microarray-based proteomics for gastric cancer applications in biomarker discovery, molecular subtyping, and precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Exosome-orchestrated network in gastric cancer: mechanisms, immune regulation, biomarkers and therapeutic vehicles.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Modeling the pre-metastatic niche of gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis under spatiotemporal resolution and investigating EVs-mediated immune suppression.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) can effectively prevent the progression of the disease and significantly improve patient survival. Currently, protein markers in clinical practice barely meet patient needs; it is therefore imperative to develop new diagnostic biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity. In this study, we extracted extracellular vesicles (EV) from the sera of 33 patients with GAC and 19 healthy controls, then applied data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry to measure protein expression profiles. Differential protein expression analysis identified 23 proteins showing expression patterns across different cancer stages, from which 15 proteins were selected as candidate biomarkers for GAC diagnosis. From this subset of 15 proteins, up to 6 proteins were iteratively selected as features and logistic regression was used to distinguish patients from healthy controls. Furthermore, serum-derived EV from a new cohort of 12 patients with gastric cancer and 18 healthy controls were quantified using the same method. A classification panel consisting of GSN, HP, ORM1, PIGR, and TFRC showed the best performance, with a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.83 and 0.82. The area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) is 0.80. Finally, to facilitate the diagnosis of advanced stage GAC, we identified a 3-protein panel consisting of LYZ, SAA1, and F12 that showed reasonably good performance with an AUC of 0.83 in the validation dataset. In conclusion, we identified new protein biomarker panels from serum EVs for early diagnosis of gastric cancer that worth further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.