Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505625›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Prevalence and determinants of isolated systolic and isolated diastolic hypertension in India: Insights from the national family health survey (NFHS)- 4.

Puneet Gupta, Prattay G Sarkar, Vivek Verma, Amit Kumar, Sameer Arora, Atul Kotwal, Sonika Raj, Sonu Goel, Sumit Malhotra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Puneet GuptaAssistant Professor (Cardiology), Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Prattay G SarkarAssistant Professor (Cardiology), RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Vivek VermaDepartment of Statistics, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India.
Amit KumarDepartment of Neurology, RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Sameer AroraFellow, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Atul KotwalExecutive Director, National Health Systems Resource Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sonika RajPublic Health Masters Program, School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Sonu GoelDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Sumit MalhotraCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAssam University · INNational Health Systems Resource Centre · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INRajendra Institute of Medical Sciences · INUniversity of Limerick · IEUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Isolated Systolic Hypertension (ISH) and Isolated Diastolic Hypertension (IDH) are often the ignored forms of hypertension and are determinants of future cardiac and neurological events and contribute to mortality. However, the nationally representative estimates of both these forms of hypertension remain unknown from India. Aim: To estimate the ISH and IDH from a nationally representative survey of India. Material and Methods: The present study used data from 7,23,181 people (15-54 years), recorded during the fourth round (2015-2016) of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), India. The prevalence of ISH and IDH was calculated for state comparison, while multilevel logistic regression analysis was done to assess the correlates of both types of hypertension. Results: The prevalence of ISH and IDH was found to be 1.2% (95% CI 1.0-1.4) and 5.7% (95% CI 5.2-6.2), respectively. The prevalence of both ISH and IDH increased with age, with a more significant increase in systolic pressure towards the higher age. Northeastern states of India (Assam, Meghalaya, and Arunachal Pradesh) had the highest prevalence of both forms of hypertension. On multilevel logistic regression, male gender, increasing age groups (highest odds ratio (OR) being in 45-49 year age group), alcohol, and diabetes positively predicted both ISH and IDH. Urban residence, literacy, and tobacco were positive predictors of IDH, whereas urban residence, smoking, and literacy negatively predicted ISH. Conclusion: ISH and IDH have a significant presence among the population of India. This data provides insights to formulate strategies at the primary and primordial prevention levels.

Indexed as

Isolated diastolic hypertensionisolated systolic hypertensionnational family health surveyprevalence

Identifiers

PMID36505625
PMCPMC9730961
OpenAlexW4311284189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.