Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505584›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Development of a personalized shared decision-making tool for knee osteoarthritis and user-testing with African American and Latina women.

Lynne C Jones, Anne M Maurer, Michael L Parks, Philip C Noble, Carla Harwell, Melvyn Harrington, Katherine G Bay, Charles L Nelson, Mary I O'Connor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Shared decision-making in health care.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Lynne C JonesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anne M MaurerAnalytics Center of Excellence, Zimmer Biomet, Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA.
Michael L ParksClinical Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Philip C NobleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopedic Research, Innovation and Training, McGovern School of Medicine, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Carla HarwellDepartment of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Melvyn HarringtonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Katherine G BayCenter for Innovation in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Houston, TX, USA.
Charles L NelsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mary I O'ConnorChief Medical Officer, Vori Health, Lewisburg, PA, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · USCenter for Innovation · USHospital for Special Surgery · USInstitute of Orthopedic Research and Education · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWinnMed · USZimmer Biomet (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic knee pain are often unaware of treatment options and likely outcomes-information that is critical to decision-making. A consistent framework for communicating patient-personalized information enables clinicians to provide consistent, targeted, and relevant information. Our objective was to user-test a shared decision-making (SDM) tool for chronic knee pain. Methods: A cross-functional team developed a Markov-based health economics model and tested the model outputs with patient panels, patient and clinician focus groups, and clinical specialists. The resulting SDM tool was user-tested in a parallel-designed, randomized controlled study with 52 African American and 52 Latina women from geographically representative areas of the US. Participants were randomized to counseling with or without the SDM tool. Feedback was collected at intervention and at 1 month after intervention and analyzed with Student's t-tests and Chi-squared analyses (alpha = 0.05). Results: Qualitative results indicated patients understood the material, rated the overall experience highly, and were likely to recommend the physician. The SDM group reported high satisfaction with the tool. A greater proportion of the SDM group (56%) reported increased physical activity over baseline at 1 month compared with the control group (33%) ( Conclusion: Use of this innovative SDM tool was associated with high satisfaction and a significant increase in self-reported physical activity level at 1 month. The SDM tool may elicit behavioral changes to promote musculoskeletal health.

Indexed as

Activity levelknee painshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID36505584
PMCPMC9731054
OpenAlexW4311284395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.