Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505449›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance (MGCS): In pursuit of optimal treatment.

Artem Oganesyan, Andrew Gregory, Florent Malard, Nerses Ghahramanyan, Mohamad Mohty, Dickran Kazandjian, Arsène Mekinian, Yervand Hakobyan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Comprehensive Review of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Contemporary Monoclonal Antibody Utilization in Glomerular Diseases.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Artem OganesyanDepartment of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, National Institute of Health, Yerevan, Armenia.
Andrew GregoryWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States.
Florent MalardDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy, INSERM, Saint-Antoine Research Centre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Nerses GhahramanyanDepartment Of Adult Hematology, Hematology Center after Prof. R. Yeolyan, Yerevan, Armenia.
Mohamad MohtyDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy, INSERM, Saint-Antoine Research Centre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Dickran KazandjianMyeloma Program, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Arsène MekinianDepartment of Internal Medicine (DMU i3), Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Yervand HakobyanDepartment of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, National Institute of Health, Yerevan, Armenia.
Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology · AMAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS) represents a new clinical entity referring to a myriad of pathological conditions associated with the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). The establishment of MGCS expands our current understanding of the pathophysiology of a range of diseases, in which the M protein is often found. Aside from the kidney, the three main organ systems most affected by monoclonal gammopathy include the peripheral nervous system, skin, and eye. The optimal management of these MGUS-related conditions is not known yet due to the paucity of clinical data, the rarity of some syndromes, and limited awareness among healthcare professionals. Currently, two main treatment approaches exist. The first one resembles the now-established therapeutic strategy for monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS), in which chemotherapy with anti-myeloma agents is used to target clonal lesion that is thought to be the culprit of the complex clinical presentation. The second approach includes various systemic immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive options, including intravenous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids, or biological agents. Although some conditions of the MGCS spectrum can be effectively managed with therapies aiming at the etiology or pathogenesis of the disease, evidence regarding other pathologies is severely limited to individual patient data from case reports or series. Future research should pursue filling the gap in knowledge and finding the optimal treatment for this novel clinical category.

Indexed as

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMultiple MyelomaClinical RelevanceHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunoglobulins, IntravenousimmunotherapyMGCSMGUSmonoclonal gammopathymonoclonal gammopathy of clinical significancemonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Identifiers

PMID36505449
PMCPMC9728929
OpenAlexW4309714133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.