Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505413›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Fluorescently tagged nanobodies and NanoBRET to study ligand-binding and agonist-induced conformational changes of full-length EGFR expressed in living cells.

Dehan Comez, Jacqueline Glenn, Stephanie M Anbuhl, Raimond Heukers, Martine J Smit, Stephen J Hill, Laura E Kilpatrick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cannabinoid CBOncogene · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NanoBCell reports methods · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dehan ComezDivision of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jacqueline GlennDivision of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Stephanie M AnbuhlDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS) Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Raimond HeukersDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS) Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martine J SmitDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS) Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stephen J HillDivision of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Laura E KilpatrickCentre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), University of Birmingham and University of Nottingham, The Midlands Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLQserve Group (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800006Medical Research Council MR/N020081/1Medical Research Council MR/W016176/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor is a member of the Erb receptor tyrosine kinase family. It binds several ligands including EGF, betacellulin (BTC) and TGF-α, controls cellular proliferation and invasion and is overexpressed in various cancer types. Nanobodies (VHHs) are the antigen binding fragments of heavy chain only camelid antibodies. In this paper we used NanoBRET to compare the binding characteristics of fluorescent EGF or two distinct fluorescently labelled EGFR directed nanobodies (Q44c and Q86c) to full length EGFR. Methods: Living HEK293T cells were stably transfected with N terminal NLuc tagged EGFR. NanoBRET saturation, displacement or kinetics experiments were then performed using fluorescently labelled EGF ligands (EGF-AF488 or EGF-AF647) or fluorescently labelled EGFR targeting nanobodies (Q44c-HL488 and Q86c-HL488). Results: These data revealed that the EGFR nanobody Q44c was able to inhibit EGF binding to full length EGFR, while Q86c was able to recognise agonist bound EGFR and act as a conformational sensor. The specific binding of fluorescent Q44c-HL488 and EGF-AF488 was inhibited by a range of EGFR ligands (EGF> BTC>TGF-α). Discussion: EGFR targeting nanobodies are powerful tools for studying the role of the EGFR in health and disease and allow real time quantification of ligand binding and distinct ligand induced conformational changes.

Indexed as

Single-Domain AntibodiesColoring AgentsEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsHEK293 CellsHumansImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsLigandsTransforming Growth Factor alphaColoring AgentsEGFR protein, humanEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsLigandsSingle-Domain AntibodiesTransforming Growth Factor alphaBRETEGFRfluorescenceNanoBiTnanobody

Identifiers

PMID36505413
PMCPMC9726709
OpenAlexW4309699487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.