Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505363›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Comparison of validation protocols for blood pressure measuring devices in children and adolescents.

Stella Stabouli, Athanasia Chainoglou, Kleo Evripidou, Carla Simão, Christina Antza, Panagiotis Petrou, Gilad Hamdani, Javier Calpe, Empar Lurbe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Validating the accuracy of the Omron HBP-M4500 blood pressure measuring device according to the ISO81060-2:2018+ Amd 1:2020 protocol.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Stella Stabouli1st Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Athanasia Chainoglou1st Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kleo Evripidou1st Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Carla SimãoDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Santa Maria, FMUL, Lisbon, Portugal.
Christina Antza3rd Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Panagiotis PetrouPharmacoepidemiology-Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacy School, School of Sciences and Engineering, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Gilad HamdaniNephrology and Hypertension Institute, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Javier CalpeAnalog Devices, SLU, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Empar LurbeDepartment of Pediatrics, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) Fisiopatologia Obesidad y Nutricion, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRHospital de Santa Maria · PTSchneider Children's Medical Center · ILUniversitat de València · ESUniversity of Nicosia · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement is important for the evaluation of hypertension in children and adolescents, and it is critically dependent upon the accuracy of the BP measuring device. A device that could pass validated protocols with reliable accuracy would be desirable in clinical and research settings. Several scientific organizations have published recommendations on the validation of different BP measuring devices. Most of them focus on adults but separate recommendations and validation criteria for BP devices intended for use in children and adolescents are included in some validation protocols. In this review, we compare the validation criteria for BP measuring devices among consensus documents from different scientific organizations focusing on the pediatric population and we discuss the evidence gaps targeting the needs for validated BP measuring devices in children and adolescents. We also highlight common pitfalls in the validation studies of BP measuring devices in children and adolescents using the example of office BP devices.

Indexed as

adolescentsblood pressurechildrendevicevalidation

Identifiers

PMID36505363
PMCPMC9727228
OpenAlexW4309840090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.