ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
The median effective concentration of remifentanil to inhibit pupillary reflex dilation induced by endotracheal intubation.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the median effective concentration (EC
methodsIn this prospective study, 34 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were selected. The induction of anesthesia was started using propofol with an effect-site concentration (Ce(pro)) of 4.0 μg/mL. The effect-site concentration of remifentanil (Ce(Remi)) was set according to the modified sequential test method, with 0.42 ng/mL as the initial concentration for the first patient. The gradient ratio was 1.1. The Ce(Remi) of each patient was determined by whether the PRD of the previous patient disappeared during endotracheal intubation. If the PRD disappeared, a lower concentration was applied. Otherwise, a higher concentration was applied. The experiment ended after 9 crosses of PRD disappearance-presence and PRD presence-disappearance. The EC
resultsThe EC
conclusionThe EC
Indexed as
Identifiers
36505339PMC9730105W4311288690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.