ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparison of postoperative analgesia with two different doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in adductor canal block for unilateral total knee replacement surgery: A randomized double-blinded study.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Optimal Dose of Butorphanol Combined with Ropivacaine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Patients Undergoing Upper Limb Fracture Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Nerve Block with Esketamine Adjuvant for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Multimodal analgesia is used to treat severe postoperative pain (POP) in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Adjuvants are used with local anesthetics to improve the quality and duration of pain relief. Studies comparing different doses of dexmedetomidine in adductor canal block (ACB) are sparse to date. This study compares postoperative analgesia with two different doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.2% ropivacaine in ACB for unilateral TKR. Material and Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparative study, sixty patients were divided into two groups: A and B. Postoperatively perineural catheter was inserted and all patients received 0.2% ropivacaine 20 mL bolus followed by an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/Kg in Group A and 1 µg/Kg in Group B) at 8 mL/h. Postoperative pain, motor blockade, rescue analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, sedation, and adverse effects were recorded. Student t, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney tests were used. Results: Most patients were elderly females (M:15, F:45). Postoperatively, from 2 Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine infusion at 1 µg/Kg is a better adjuvant to 0.2% ropivacaine than 0.5 µg/Kg in ACB. It provides better analgesia without producing sedation, motor blockade, hemodynamic changes, or any adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.