ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparative evaluation of ultrasound guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterizations in adult patients.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Subclavian Vein Cannulation via Supraclavicular or Infraclavicular Route Which is Better? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Puncture Pneumoperitoneum for Laparoscopy. Pilot Study of a New Technique in an Animal Model.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2024Article
- Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation using open door technique - A technical report.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Efficacy and safety of supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach for subclavian vein catheterisation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- How to improve the efficiency and the safety of real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in 2023: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2023Review
- Comparison of safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation in intensive care unit patients: A randomized clinical study.International journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation has two approaches: supraclavicular and infraclavicular. The aim of this study was to compare the ease of cannulation by recording the puncture time of the subclavian vein with the two approaches in adult patients. Material and Methods: This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee, and a written informed consent was obtained from the patients. This prospective randomized trial recruited patients aged 18 to 80 years with definite indications of subclavian vein cannulation. Real-time in-plane ultrasound-guided technique was used, and the subclavian vein was punctured at the junction of the brachiocephalic and IJV in supraclavicular approach (SC) and in oblique axis below the border of the clavicle in infraclavicular approach (IC). Results: A total of 96 patients were randomly allocated equally into two groups of 48 each, but only 45 patients in each group could be successfully cannulated. Median puncture times were comparable; 15 (9-39) s in SC and 21 (5-80) s in IC group. The first attempt success rate was 82.2% and 62.2%, and the mean total access time was 99.11 ± 34.66 s and 103.44 ± 50.27 s in SC and IC approaches, respectively and were comparable. The attempts of needle puncture were significantly higher in IC approach (1.40 ± 0.54 vs 1.20 ± 0.46 in SC approach; Conclusion: Ease of cannulation of the subclavian vein using ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular approach is comparable as no statistically significant difference is noted in the puncture time and first-attempt success rate. The increased number of needle punctures reported in our study with the IC approach did not translate to an increased complication rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.