Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505187›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Comparative evaluation of ultrasound guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterizations in adult patients.

Vikas Saini, Amburu Vamsidhar, Tanvir Samra, Sameer Sethi, B N Naik

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Subclavian Vein Cannulation via Supraclavicular or Infraclavicular Route Which is Better? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Vikas SainiDepartment of Anesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, India.
Amburu VamsidharDepartment of Anesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, India.
Tanvir SamraDepartment of Anesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, India.
Sameer SethiDepartment of Anesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, India.
B N NaikDepartment of Anesthesia, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, India.
Creative Commons · USPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation has two approaches: supraclavicular and infraclavicular. The aim of this study was to compare the ease of cannulation by recording the puncture time of the subclavian vein with the two approaches in adult patients. Material and Methods: This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee, and a written informed consent was obtained from the patients. This prospective randomized trial recruited patients aged 18 to 80 years with definite indications of subclavian vein cannulation. Real-time in-plane ultrasound-guided technique was used, and the subclavian vein was punctured at the junction of the brachiocephalic and IJV in supraclavicular approach (SC) and in oblique axis below the border of the clavicle in infraclavicular approach (IC). Results: A total of 96 patients were randomly allocated equally into two groups of 48 each, but only 45 patients in each group could be successfully cannulated. Median puncture times were comparable; 15 (9-39) s in SC and 21 (5-80) s in IC group. The first attempt success rate was 82.2% and 62.2%, and the mean total access time was 99.11 ± 34.66 s and 103.44 ± 50.27 s in SC and IC approaches, respectively and were comparable. The attempts of needle puncture were significantly higher in IC approach (1.40 ± 0.54 vs 1.20 ± 0.46 in SC approach; Conclusion: Ease of cannulation of the subclavian vein using ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular approach is comparable as no statistically significant difference is noted in the puncture time and first-attempt success rate. The increased number of needle punctures reported in our study with the IC approach did not translate to an increased complication rate.

Indexed as

Infraclavicular approachsubclavian vein cannulationsupraclavicular approachultrasound guidance

Identifiers

PMID36505187
PMCPMC9728414
OpenAlexW4311290143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.