ArticleCureus2022
Assessing the Malignancy Risk of a Meningioma by Its Location.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Prognostic Role of Fibulin-2 and Ki-67 Index in Patients with Meningioma: A Study among Minangkabau Ethnicity.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeningiomas represent 30% of primary intracranial tumors. The current incidence is up to 4.5 cases per 100,000 habitants worldwide. Although there is no prognostic difference among benign histopathological subtypes, atypical meningiomas and malignant meningiomas (WHO grade II and III respectively) may extend to the adjacent brain parenchyma, dura mater, and osseous tissue with a recurrence score (21-49%). This manuscript analyzes the malignancy risk according to neoplastic localization through a logistic retrospective analysis from a total sample of 452 patients with grade I, II, and III (WHO) meningiomas.
methodsDetailed data collection through a three-year retrospective analysis (January 2008 to December 2011) was applied at Mexico's National Neurology and Neurosurgery Institute including patients with intracranial or spinal-cord meningioma, preoperative imaging study availability and post-surgical histopathological diagnosis. Formal written consent was not required with a waiver by the appropriate national research ethics committee in accordance with the provisions of the regulations of the general health law of Mexico.
resultsConvexity lesions displayed an increased risk of malignancy turning for non-benign meningiomas with an odds ratio of 3.1 (95% CI 1.6 to 5.7, p=0.0002) meanwhile skull-base meningiomas present an inverse risk with an odds ratio of 0.4 (95% CI 0.2 to 0.9, p=0.02), as well as spinal-cord meningiomas with an odds ratio of 0.3 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.9).
conclusionSkull base and spinal cord meningiomas usually have benign behavior, meanwhile grade II or III meningiomas within this location are rare. The present work provides an additional criterion for decision making, according to the meningioma's location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.