ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022
Construction and validation of NSMC-ASIL, a predictive model for risk assessment of malignant hepatic nodules.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based model for predicting tumor recurrence after interventional therapy in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients with low preoperative platelet-albumin-bilirubin score.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of nomogram to predict overall survival and disease-free survival after surgical resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most malignant hepatic nodules (MHNs) eventually progress to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, assessment of the risk of malignancy in high-risk groups of patients with hepatic nodules remains a challenge. This study aimed to develop and validate a simple scoring system to predict the risk of development of MHNs. 1144 patients with primary nodular lesions of hepatic were divided into training cohort and validation cohort. The nomogram model for predicting the risk of MHNs was established according to age, sex, nodule size, prothrombin time (PT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), γ-glutamine acyltransferase isoenzyme (γ-GT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bile acid (TBA), and total bilirubin (TBIL) in training cohort by logistic regression and validated in validation cohort. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the predictive model for diagnosing MHNs in training cohort was 0.969 (95% CI: 0.959-0.979), with sensitivity 93.38% and specificity 90.75%, and the AUC in the validation cohort was 0.986 (95% CI: 0.975-0.996), with sensitivity 90.81% and specificity 94.26%. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of this model for the diagnosis of early-stage HCC were 0.942, 88.64% and 87.35% in training cohort, and 0.956, 87.04% and 91.85% in validation cohort, respectively. We established a nomogram model that used intuitive data for reliably predicting the risk of MHNs, and this model also showed good diagnostic accuracy in predicting early-stage HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36504900PMC9729894W4311283345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.