Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36504729›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia reports

Use of a urinary catheter as a guidewire to facilitate safe nasotracheal intubation following iatrogenic retropharyngeal perforation.

J Xing, Y Zhang, J Guan, J Cai, B Wu, Z Hei

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J XingDepartment of Anesthesiology The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0275-2885
Y ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
J GuanDepartment of Anesthesiology The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
J CaiDepartment of Anesthesiology The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
B WuDepartment of Anesthesiology The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Z HeiDepartment of Anesthesiology The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasotracheal intubation facilitates adequate access for surgical procedures in the oral cavity, is not limited by mouth opening and can be better tolerated by patients in intensive care. Complications of nasotracheal intubation can include epistaxis, turbinate injury and sinusitis. Retropharyngeal submucosal perforation by the tracheal tube has also been infrequently reported. Here, we report a case of difficult nasotracheal intubation resulting in retropharyngeal submucosal perforation in a patient with a history of obstructive sleep apnoea listed for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. To facilitate successful tracheal re-intubation, we used a soft urinary catheter via the other nostril. In this report, we discuss the reasons why this complication may have occurred, how submucosal perforation could be avoided, and reflect on our management of this rare complication. Difficult nasotracheal intubation can present unique challenges, and airway management plans should be made accordingly.

Indexed as

complicationnasotracheal intubationobstructive sleep apnoea, retropharyngeal perforation

Identifiers

PMID36504729
PMCPMC9722399
OpenAlexW4311289376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.