ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Remote programming for subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote programming versus standard in-person programming following deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Influence of Online Sessions via a Deep Brain Stimulation Device: Prospective, Single-Arm, Longitudinal, Nonrandomized Self-Controlled Cohort Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Real-world multicenter assessment of sustained clinical outcomes after digital deep brain stimulation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in deep brain stimulation for movement disorders.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Psychometric reliability of patient-reported visual analogue scales in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation programming for Parkinson's disease.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Remote Programming for Deep Brain Stimulation among Patients with Isolated Dystonia: Patient Attitudes and Treatment Effect.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Accelerated symptom improvement in Parkinson's disease via remote internet-based optimization of deep brain stimulation therapy: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Motor improvement of remote programming in patients with Parkinson's disease after deep brain stimulation: a 1-year follow-up.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Current and future applications of local field potential-guided programming for Parkinson's disease with the Percept™ rechargeable neurostimulator.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2024Review
- The Related Factors and Effect of Electrode Displacement on Motor Outcome of Subthalamic Nuclei Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Towards full remote programming for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: A case series.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is effective for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Moreover, remote programming is widely used in Mainland China. This necessitates evaluating the ability of remote programming to achieve the ideal postoperative effect. Therefore, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the effects of different programming modes on the effectiveness of STN-DBS 12 months postoperatively in patients with PD. Methods: Clinical data were collected retrospectively, before and 12 months after surgery, in 83 patients with PD. Based on the programming modes voluntarily selected by the patients during 12 months postoperatively, they were divided into three groups, namely remote programming alone, hospital programming alone, and hospital + remote programming. We compared the programming data and the effects of different programming methods on STN-DBS-related improvements 12 months postoperatively among these groups. Furthermore, we analyzed STN-DBS-related improvements at 12 months postoperatively in 76 patients. Results: The effectiveness of STN-DBS was not influenced by the three programming modes. The postoperative Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores did not reveal statistically significant differences between the remote alone and hospital alone programming groups, except for motor examination. The postoperative decline in the levodopa equivalent daily dose was most apparent in the hospital programming alone group. The programming frequency of the hospital + remote programming group was considerably higher than that of the remaining groups. Seventy-six patients with PD displayed good STN-DBS surgical efficacy. Conclusion: Programming modes do not influence the short-term efficacy of STN-DBS, and remote programming can yield a satisfactory surgical effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.