Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36504615›Full record

ArticleGerms2022

Integrated antibiotic clinical decision support system (CDSS) for appropriate choice and dosage: an analysis of retrospective data.

Marius Schaut, Marion Schaefer, Ulrike Trost, André Sander

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Germs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marius SchautPharmacist, MSc, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and ID Information und Dokumentation im Gesundheitswesen GmbH & Co. KGaA, Platz vor dem Neuen Tor 2, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Marion SchaeferPharmacist, Prof, Dr, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike TrostPharmacist, Dr, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
André SanderDr, ID Information und Dokumentation im Gesundheitswesen GmbH & Co. KGaA, Platz vor dem Neuen Tor 2, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DELandeszentrum Gesundheit Nordrhein-Westfalen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Decision-making for inpatient antibiotic prescribing is complex due to many considerations to be taken. So far, clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been rarely used in antibiotic stewardship (ABS) and even less integrated in computerized physician order entry systems (CPOE). Methods: We developed a guideline-based, CPOE-integrated CDSS (ID ANTIBIOTICS) to support antibiotic selection and dosing. We compared routine antibiotic inpatient prescribing data with CDSS-generated recommendations in the initial antibiotic selection, the duration of therapies, and costs. Finally, we assessed possible benefits of the CDSS by its performance in German ABS-guideline quality indicators (ABS-QIs). Results: The requirements of several ABS-QIs can be supported with ID ANTIBIOTICS: electronic local guidelines, electronic decision-support, renal dosage adjustments, local guideline-based initial selection (all not quantified), and therapy durations for the treatment of pneumonia (significantly) without increasing costs. Performance in ABS-QIs for extensive therapies for community-acquired pneumonia could be improved with the CDSS by 20.2% (OR 0.134; 95% CI: 0.101-0.178); for hospital-acquired pneumonia by 3.7% (OR 0.742; 95% CI: 0.629-0.877). There was no difference in median daily drug costs between real-world prescriptions and CDSS recommendations (both: € 4.78, p=0.081). Conclusions: In retrospective analyses, antibiotic CDSS can show possible performance in antibiotic stewardship through quality indicators (ABS-QIs). Further research and pilot testing of the software are needed to provide more insights into ABS-QI evaluation, user acceptance, and real-world effectiveness. Deep integration of antibiotic CDSS into existing medication processes without using multiple systems could contribute to the necessary acceptance of clinical practitioners.

Indexed as

antibiotic stewardshipClinical decision supportguideline-based decision supportinitial antibiotic selectioninpatient antibiotic prescribingquality indicators

Identifiers

PMID36504615
PMCPMC9719375
OpenAlexW4292528226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.