ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
3D-printed guides for cervical pedicle screw placement in primary spine tumor: Case report and technical description.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A new minimally invasive cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation system using intra-operative computed tomography-guided navigation.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
- Craniovertebral Junction Instability after Oncological Resection: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: For spine surgeons, dealing with unstable cervical spine has been usually challenging, and this becomes more difficult when facing a primary craniovertebral junction tumor. Primary spine tumor surgery should always include column reconstruction in order to guarantee biomechanical stability of the spine, but surgeons should always be aware that instrumentations could create interferences with postoperative radiations. However, although carbon fiber instrumentations have started to be used in thoracolumbar oncology for few years, these options are still not available for cervical spine. In the reported case, the adopted strategy to obtain adequate column reconstruction was based on the idea of reducing the amount of titanium needed for posterior fixation and maximizing the distance between the radiation target and titanium rods. Case report and aim: We present the case of a 53-year-old woman harboring a craniovertebral junction chordoma. A short occipito-C3 construct was selected. Specifically, titanium cervical pedicle screws were placed by using a new technology consisting in patient-tailored and customized 3D-printed guides. The aim of this case report is to determine the feasibility and safety of 3D-printed guides for cervical pedicle screw (CPS) positioning, even in the case of cervical spine tumor. Conclusion: CPS could represent a good solution by providing strong biomechanical purchase and tailored 3D-printed guides could increase the safety and the accuracy of this challenging screw placement, even in oncological patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.