ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022
U-blade gamma 3 vs. gamma 3 nails for intertrochanteric hip fracture: Meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative strain‑gauge analysis of Gamma3 and Gamma3 reconstruction nails in unstable basicervical femur fractures: a pilot biomechanical study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Treatment outcomes of concomitant ipsilateral neck and trochanteric fractures using Gamma3 nails with U-blade lag screws.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Intertrochanteric fracture is a growing problem in the traumatology department. The use of intramedullary devices has increased, representing the first treatment option in intertrochanteric fractures. U-Blade devices appeared to avoid rotation of the femoral head over the femoral neck. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures comparing in terms of safety and efficacy the U-Blade Gamma 3 nail vs. the conventional Gamma 3 nail. Methods: A literature search for intertrochanteric fracture 31A1-31A3 according to the AO foundation/orthopaedic trauma association (AO/OTA) classification was performed. Baseline characteristics of each article were obtained; radiological outcomes were tip apex distance (TAD), sliding distance (mm), cut-out rate, and lateralization rate. Surgery time (min) was also recorded. A meta-analysis was performed with ReviewManager 5.4. Results: Five retrospective studies ( Conclusions: The use of U-Blade Gamma 3 did not show significant differences in the radiological results compared with the conventional Gamma 3 nail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.