ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Assessment of clinical outcome of surgically managed panfacial fractures with or without ancillary procedures. A 10-year retrospective study.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of Initial CT Imaging for Surgical Planning and Outcomes in Panfacial Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary management in panfacial trauma: A clinical study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- A Shift in Conceptual Thinking of Panfacial Fracture Sequencing: The Major Fragment Theory.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025Article
- Correlation between facial bone fractures and associated long bone injuries in polytrauma patients: A retrospective imaging-based study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the demographic factors, different patterns, complications, and clinical outcomes based on various ancillary surgical procedures performed during the management of panfacial fractures. Materials and methods: Patients diagnosed with panfacial fractures, who underwent surgical management from 2011 to 2020 were included. The predictor variable was five ancillary surgical procedures, orbital reconstruction with autogenous bone graft, primary nasal bone grafting, open reduction and internal fixation or custom-made palatal splint for palatal fractures, ORIF for zygomatic arch fractures, and reattachment of Medical Canthal Ligament. The outcome variable was post-operative complications. Age, sex, etiology of trauma and pattern of panfacial fractures were the co-variates for the study. The incidence of complications with or without performing ancillary surgical procedures was analyzed. Results: A total of 1028 patients were treated for various maxillofacial trauma from 2011 to 2020.103 patients were diagnosed with panfacial fractures. 27 of 103 patients were excluded, 76 patients were included in the study with strict adherence to the inclusion criteria. Statistical Analysis was done using SPSS software version 23.0. Chi-Square test was performed to analyze the incidence of complication and fracture pattern. The results were statistically significant for three procedures which included orbital reconstruction, primary nasal bone grafting, and ORIF for palatal fractures with p-value, 0.032, 0.022, and 0.012 respectively. Conclusion: The results suggested that performing ancillary procedures in the management of panfacial fractures significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative complications and improves the clinical outcome.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.