ArticleOral radiology2023
A new perspective for radiologic findings of bruxism on dental panoramic radiography.
Article in Oral radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mandibular bone apposition in relation to temporomandibular joint disorders: a radiographic and MRI study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Impact of bruxism on the mandibular angle and condylar structures: a panoramic radiographic assessment.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of fractal analysis and radiomorphometric measurements of mandibular bone structure in bruxism and non-bruxism paediatric patients.Oral radiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of mandibular trabecular and cortical bone by fractal analysis and radiomorphometric indices in bruxist and non-bruxist patients.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Relationship between bruxism and mandibular bone modifications based on medical imaging: a scoping review.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Morphological evaluation of gonial and antegonial regions in bruxers on panoramic radiographic images.BMC oral health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate whether there is a relationship between the appositional classification in the mandible angle region and the mandibular cortical index (MCI) seen in bruxist individuals and to differentiate between the bruxist group without mandibular apposition and the non-bruxist group on panoramic radiographs.
methodsThe mandible angle region of 209 individuals, 170 bruxists and 39 non-bruxists, were included in the study. Each mandible angle apposition was classified as G0 (No directional change, no bone apposition)-G1 (Directional change on the basal cortex. No bone apposition)-G2 (Directional change plus generalized bone apposition with inhomogeneous surface)-G3 (Directional change plus localized bone apposition at one or more sites). The MCI of each individual was recorded according to their classified apposition.
resultsNo statistically significant difference was found in the relationship between MCI and apposition severity in mandible angle grades in bruxist individuals (p = 0.063). A statistically significant difference was found between MCI and the bruxist G0/non-bruxist G0 groups (p < 0.001). While the MCI-C1 was higher in non-bruxist G0 individuals, the MCI-C2 was higher in bruxist G0 individuals. A statistically significant correlation was found between gender and severity of grades (p < 0.001).
conclusionAlthough it is known that appositional changes are seen in the mandible angle region in bruxism, MCI can be used as a valuable radiologic diagnostic criterion during the evaluation of bruxist and healthy individuals in the G0 grade who have not yet radiologically demonstrated bone apposition in the mandible angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36504381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.