ArticleClinical oral investigations2023
Light orthodontic force with high-frequency vibration accelerates tooth movement with minimal root resorption in rats.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on pain control after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Effective mechanical vibration frequency in canine tooth movement acceleration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial studies.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Pooled it
- A comparison of the released forces from three different types of nickel-titanium wires at three different deflection positions: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Synergistic effects of high-frequency vibration and orthodontic force on osteoclast numbers and root resorption in a rat model.The Angle orthodontist · 2025Article
- The age-related effects on orthodontic tooth movement and the surrounding periodontal environment.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine and compare the effects of high-frequency mechanical vibration (HFV) with light force and optimal force on the tooth movement and root resorption in rat model. MATERIALS AND
methodsSeventy-two sites in 36 male Wistar rats were randomly assigned using a split-mouth design to control (no force/no vibration) or experimental groups: HFV (125 Hz), light force (5 g), optimal force (10 g), light force with HFV, and optimal force with HFV for 14 and 21 days. The amount of tooth movement, 3D root volume, and root resorption area were assessed by micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis.
resultsAdjunction of HFV with light force significantly increased the amount of tooth movement by 1.8-fold (p = 0.01) and 2.0-fold (p = 0.01) at days 14 and 21 respectively. The HFV combined with optimal force significantly increased the amount of tooth movement by 2.1-fold (p = 0.01) and 2.2-fold (p = 0.01) at days 14 and 21 respectively. The root volume in control (distobuccal root (DB): 0.60 ± 0.19 mm
conclusionsAdjunction of HFV with orthodontic force significantly increased tooth movement without causing root resorption. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using light force with HFV could help to identify alternative treatment option to reduce the risk of root resorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.