Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36504142›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2024

Prospective risk analysis of the online-adaptive artificial intelligence-driven workflow using the Ethos treatment system.

Sonja Wegener, Florian Exner, Stefan Weick, Silke Stark, Heike Hutzel, Paul Lutyj, Jörg Tamihardja, Gary Razinskas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Longitudinal stability of HyperSightScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Risk management in radiation-based therapies.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sonja WegenerUniversity of Wuerzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: Wegener_S1@ukw.de.
Florian ExnerUniversity of Wuerzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: Exner_F@ukw.de.
Stefan WeickUniversity of Wuerzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: Weick_S@ukw.de.
Silke StarkUniversity of Wuerzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: Stark_S@ukw.de.
Heike HutzelUniversity of Wuerzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: Hutzel_H@ukw.de.
Paul LutyjUniversity of Wuerzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: Lutyj_P@ukw.de.
Jörg TamihardjaUniversity of Wuerzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: Tamihardja_J@ukw.de.
Gary RazinskasUniversity of Wuerzburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wuerzburg, Germany. Electronic address: Razinskas_G@ukw.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe recently introduced Varian Ethos system allows adjusting radiotherapy treatment plans to anatomical changes on a daily basis. The system uses artificial intelligence to speed up the process of creating adapted plans, comes with its own software solutions and requires a substantially different workflow. A detailed analysis of possible risks of the associated workflow is presented.

methodsA prospective risk analysis of the adaptive workflow with the Ethos system was performed using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). An interprofessional team collected possible adverse events and evaluated their severity as well as their chance of occurrence and detectability. Measures to reduce the risks were discussed.

resultsA total of 122 events were identified, and scored. Within the 20 events with the highest-ranked risks, the following were identified: Challenges due to the stand-alone software solution with very limited connectivity to the existing record and verify software and digital patient file, unfamiliarity with the new software and its limitations and the adaption process relying on results obtained by artificial intelligence. The risk analysis led to the implementation of additional quality assurance measures in the workflow.

conclusionsThe thorough analysis of the risks associated with the new treatment technique was the basis for designing details of the workflow. The analysis also revealed challenges to be addressed by both, the vendor and customers. On the vendor side, this includes improving communication between their different software solutions. On the customer side, this especially includes establishing validation strategies to monitor the results of the black box adaption process making use of artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceWorkflowHumansProspective StudiesRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRisk AssessmentSoftwareArtificial intelligenceEthosOnline adaptive radiotherapyRisk analysis

Identifiers

PMID36504142
PMCPMC11384068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.