Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36504138›Full record

ReviewTrends in biochemical sciences2023

Novel machine learning approaches revolutionize protein knowledge.

Nicola Bordin, Christian Dallago, Michael Heinzinger, Stephanie Kim, Maria Littmann, Clemens Rauer, Martin Steinegger, Burkhard Rost, Christine Orengo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biochemical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicola BordinInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, Gower St, WC1E 6BT London, UK.
Christian DallagoTechnical University of Munich (TUM) Department of Informatics, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology - i12, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany; VantAI, 151 W 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Michael HeinzingerTechnical University of Munich (TUM) Department of Informatics, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology - i12, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany; TUM Graduate School, Center of Doctoral Studies in Informatics and its Applications (CeDoSIA), Boltzmannstr. 11, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Stephanie KimSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea; Artificial Intelligence Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Maria LittmannTechnical University of Munich (TUM) Department of Informatics, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology - i12, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany.
Clemens RauerInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, Gower St, WC1E 6BT London, UK.
Martin SteineggerSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea; Artificial Intelligence Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Burkhard RostTechnical University of Munich (TUM) Department of Informatics, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology - i12, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany; Institute for Advanced Study (TUM-IAS), Lichtenbergstr. 2a, 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany; TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan (TUM-WZW), Alte Akademie 8, Freising, Germany.
Christine OrengoInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, Gower St, WC1E 6BT London, UK. Electronic address: c.orengo@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T002735/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 221327/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breakthrough methods in machine learning (ML), protein structure prediction, and novel ultrafast structural aligners are revolutionizing structural biology. Obtaining accurate models of proteins and annotating their functions on a large scale is no longer limited by time and resources. The most recent method to be top ranked by the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) assessment, AlphaFold 2 (AF2), is capable of building structural models with an accuracy comparable to that of experimental structures. Annotations of 3D models are keeping pace with the deposition of the structures due to advancements in protein language models (pLMs) and structural aligners that help validate these transferred annotations. In this review we describe how recent developments in ML for protein science are making large-scale structural bioinformatics available to the general scientific community.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProteinsComputational BiologyProtein ConformationProteinsAIAlphaFold2embeddingsmachine learningpLMprotein structure predictionstructure alignment

Identifiers

PMID36504138
PMCPMC10570143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.