Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36504046›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Qualitative and quantitative phytochemical screening of Nerium oleander L. extracts associated with toxicity profile.

Neşe Bakir Çilesizoğlu, Emine Yalçin, Kültiğin Çavuşoğlu, Selin Sipahi Kuloğlu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Utilisation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Exploring the neuropharmacological properties of scopoletin-richAmerican journal of translational research · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Unveiling Nephroprotective, Diuretic and Toxicity Response ofDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neşe Bakir ÇilesizoğluDepartment of Biology, Institute of Science, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Emine YalçinDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science and Art, Giresun University, 28200, Giresun, Turkey. emine.yalcin@giresun.edu.tr.
Kültiğin ÇavuşoğluDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science and Art, Giresun University, 28200, Giresun, Turkey.
Selin Sipahi KuloğluDepartment of Biology, Institute of Science, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Giresun University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, phytochemical analysis and toxicity profile of leaf and flower extracts of Nerium oleander L. species collected from Giresun province (Turkey) were investigated. In phytochemical analyzes, the cardiac glycoside, alkaloid, saponin and tannin contents of the extracts were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The physiological effects of extracts were determined by examining root elongation, weight gain and germination rates. Biochemical effects were determined by measuring the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), which are indicators of oxidative stress. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects were investigated by mitotic index (MI), micronucleus (MN) and chromosomal abnormality (CA) tests. N. oleander leaf and flower extract applications caused significant decreases in the physiological parameters of Allium bulbs. SOD and CAT activity in root tip cells increased significantly after the application of leaf extract compared to the control group. Similar changes were observed in the application of flower extract, but these increases were found to be at a lower level compared to the increases induced by the leaf extract. An increase in MDA levels and a decrease in GSH levels were observed in groups treated with leaf and flower extracts. These changes show that the extracts cause deterioration in antioxidant/oxidant balance. It was determined that the extracts, which caused a decrease in MI rates and an increase in MN and CAs frequencies, showed the most prominent cytotoxic and genotoxic effects at 250 μg/mL doses. These toxic effects were associated with the phytochemical content of the extracts, and it was thought that cardiac glycosides and alkaloids, whose presence were detected in qualitative and quantitative analyzes, may play an important role in toxicity. Studies investigating the therapeutic properties of plants as well as their toxic effects are insufficient, which leads to the fact that plants exhibiting potential toxicity are not well known. Therefore, this study will lead many studies on the toxicity profile of the phytochemical contents of plants. Therefore, this study will draw attention to the investigation of the toxicity profile and phytochemical contents of plants and will lead to similar studies.

Indexed as

Cardiac GlycosidesPhytochemicalsAntioxidantsGlutathionePlant ExtractsSuperoxide DismutaseTanninsAntioxidantsCardiac GlycosidesGlutathionePhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsSuperoxide DismutaseTannins

Identifiers

PMID36504046
PMCPMC9742154
OpenAlexW4311663423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.