ReviewJournal of biosciences2022
Effects of immunosuppressants on T-cell dynamics: Understanding from a generic coarse-grained immune network model.
Review in Journal of biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impaired humoral and T helper cell responses to toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) in granulomatosis with polyangiitis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Immunosuppressants rewire the gut microbiome-alloimmune axis through time-dependent and tissue-specific mechanisms.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Article
- Immunosuppressants Rewire the Gut Microbiome-Alloimmune Axis Through Time-Dependent and Tissue-Specific Mechanisms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Maintenance Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplantation: A Review of the Current Status and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term immunosuppressive therapy is a drug regimen often used to lower aggressive immune responses in various chronic inflammatory diseases. However, such long-term therapy leading to immune suppression may trigger other adverse reactions in the immune system. The rising concern regarding the optimal dose and duration of such treatment has motivated us to understand non-classical immunomodulatory responses induced by various immunosuppressive steroid and secosteroid drugs such as glucocorticoid and vitamin D supplements. The immunomodulatory actions of such immunosuppressants (that govern the adaptive immune response) are often mediated through their characteristic control over CD4+ T-cells involving pro- and antiinflammatory T-cells. Several early studies attempted to decode temporal and dose-dependent behaviors of such pro- and anti-inflammatory T-cells using the chemical dynamics approach. We first summarize these early works. Then, we develop a minimal coarse-grained kinetic network model to capture the commonality in their immunomodulatory functions. This generic model successfully reproduces the characteristic dynamical features, including the clinical latency period in long-term T-cell dynamics. The temporal behavior of T-cells is found to be sensitive to specific rate parameters and doses of immunosuppressants. The steady-state analysis reflects the transition from an early classified weakly regulated (autoimmune-prone) immune state to a strongly regulated state (immunocompromised state), separated by an intervening state of moderate/balanced regulation. An optimal dose and duration are essential in rescuing balanced immune regulation. This review elucidates how developing a simple generic coarse-grained immune network model may provide immense information that helps diagnose inefficacy in adaptive immune function before and after administering immunosuppressants such as glucocorticoid or vitamin D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36503907PMC9734612W4311672064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.