Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36503859›Full record

ReviewVaccine2024

Leaving no one behind: Defining and implementing an integrated life course approach to vaccination across the next decade as part of the immunization Agenda 2030.

A S Wallace, T K Ryman, L Privor-Dumm, C Morgan, R Fields, C Garcia, S V Sodha, A Lindstrand, L M Nic Lochlainn

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A S WallaceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: awallace@cdc.gov.
T K RymanBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, United States.
L Privor-DummJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, International Vaccine Access Center, Baltimore, MD, United States.
C MorganJhpiego, the Johns Hopkins University affiliate, Baltimore, MD, United States.
R FieldsJohn Snow Inc., Arlington, VA, United States.
C GarciaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, International Vaccine Access Center, Baltimore, MD, United States.
S V SodhaDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
A LindstrandDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
L M Nic LochlainnDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Johns Hopkins University · USWorld Health Organization · CHBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USJohn Snow (United States) · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategic Priority 4 (SP4) of the Immunization Agenda 2030 aims to ensure that all people benefit from recommended immunizations throughout the life-course, integrated with essential health services. Therefore, it is necessary for immunization programs to have coordination and collaboration across all health programs. Although there has been progress, immunization platforms in the second year of life and beyond need continued strengthening, including booster doses and catch-up vaccination, for all ages, and recommended vaccines for older age groups. We note gaps in current vaccination programs policies and achieved coverage, in the second year of life and beyond. In 2021, the second dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV2), given in the second year of life, achieved 71% global coverage vs 81% for MCV1. For adolescents, 60% of all countries have adopted human papillomavirus vaccines in their vaccination schedule with a global coverage rate of only 12 percent in 2021. Approximately 65% of the countries recommend influenza vaccines for older adults, high-risk adults and pregnant women, and only 25% recommended pneumococcal vaccines for older adults. To achieve an integrated life course approach to vaccination, we reviewed the evidence, gaps, and strategies in four focus areas: generating evidence for disease burden and potential vaccine impact in older age groups; building awareness and shifting policy beyond early childhood; building integrated delivery approaches throughout the life course; and identifying missed opportunities for vaccination, implementing catch-up strategies, and monitoring vaccination throughout the life course. We identified needs, such as tailoring strategies to the local context, conducting research and advocacy to mobilize resources and build political will. Mustering sufficient financial support and demand for an integrated life course approach to vaccination, particularly in times of COVID-19, is both a challenge and an opportunity.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsVaccinationAdolescentChildCOVID-19FemaleGlobal HealthHumansImmunization ScheduleInfantVaccination CoverageAdult vaccinationIA2030ImmunizationLife course

Identifiers

PMID36503859
PMCPMC10414185
OpenAlexW4311086869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.