Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36503640›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2022

The skin microbiota of the axolotl Ambystoma altamirani is highly influenced by metamorphosis and seasonality but not by pathogen infection.

Emanuel Martínez-Ugalde, Víctor Ávila-Akerberg, Tanya M González Martínez, Montserrat Vázquez Trejo, Dalia Zavala Hernández, Sara Lucia Anaya-Morales, Eria A Rebollar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Skin microbiota during metamorphosis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Gene functions of theMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Temporal microbiome changes in axolotl limb regeneration: Stage-specific restructuring of bacterial and fungal communities with a Flavobacterium bloom during blastema proliferation.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emanuel Martínez-UgaldeCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Víctor Ávila-AkerbergInstituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Mexico.
Tanya M González MartínezFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Montserrat Vázquez TrejoFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Dalia Zavala HernándezFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sara Lucia Anaya-MoralesCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Eria A RebollarCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico. rebollar@ccg.unam.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiomes have been increasingly recognized as major contributors to host health and survival. In amphibians, bacterial members of the skin microbiota protect their hosts by inhibiting the growth of the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd). Even though several studies describe the influence of biotic and abiotic factors over the skin microbiota, it remains unclear how these symbiotic bacterial communities vary across time and development. This is particularly relevant for species that undergo metamorphosis as it has been shown that host physiology and ecology drastically influence diversity of the skin microbiome.

resultsWe found that the skin bacterial communities of the axolotl A. altamirani are largely influenced by the metamorphic status of the host and by seasonal variation of abiotic factors such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity. Despite high Bd prevalence in these samples, the bacterial diversity of the skin microbiota did not differ between infected and non-infected axolotls, although relative abundance of particular bacteria were correlated with Bd infection intensity.

conclusionsOur work shows that metamorphosis is a crucial process that shapes skin bacterial communities and that axolotls under different developmental stages respond differently to environmental seasonal variations. Moreover, this study greatly contributes to a better understanding of the factors that shape amphibian skin microbiota, especially in a largely underexplored group like axolotls (Mexican Ambystoma species).

Indexed as

AmphibiansMetamorphosisSeasonalitySkin microbiota

Identifiers

PMID36503640
PMCPMC9743558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.