ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022
Spontaneous correction of scoliosis after curettage of spinal osteoid osteoma: How and when?
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Lumbar Spinal Osteoid Osteoma Associated with Kyphoscoliosis, Head Drop, and Pelvic Obliquity: A Case Report.JBJS case connector · 2025Article
- Intra- and Juxta-Articular Osteoid Osteoma Mimicking Arthritis: Case Series and Literature Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScoliosis behavior after curettage of spinal osteoid osteoma has been not clarified as most studies regarding scoliosis secondary to osteoid osteoma (OO) were case reports. The aims of this study were to investigate (1) clinical and radiographic features of scoliosis secondary to OO; (2) scoliosis behavior after Curettage of OO.
methodsA retrospective study was performed at patients who were diagnosed as OO clinically or pathologically from July 1998 to December 2019 in a single institution. Age, gender, location of pain, location of lesion and curve pattern of scoliosis were collected preoperatively. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time and surgical complications were documented. VAS scores and curve magnitude were collected pre- and postoperatively and at last follow-up.
resultsThe mean operation time was 124 ± 32 min and the average intraoperative blood loss was 274 ± 134 ml. The mean preoperative VAS score was 6.2 ± 2.7, and the mean postoperative VAS score was 2.1 ± 1.8. Thoracic scoliosis was improved from 22.7 ± 10.6° to 6.2 ± 4.3° after operation, and to 4.1 ± 4.3° at last follow-up. Lumbar scoliosis was improved from 18.1 ± 7.4° to 6.7 ± 5.2° after operation, and to 5.3 ± 3.9° at last follow-up. Trunk shift was improved from 34.7 ± 12.4 to 10.5 ± 7.2 mm after operation, and to 8.4 ± 5.6 mm at last follow-up. There was no significant differences as to sagittal radiographic parameters (P > 0.05).
conclusionPatients with spinal OO had a significantly high incidence of scoliosis. Patients could get rapid relief of pain and scoliosis with low occurrence. Night pain, pain at the concave side of curve, normal sagittal alignment could help differentiate it from scoliosis associated with lumbar disc herniation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.