Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36503565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2022

Social dynamics impact scolding behaviour in captive groups of common ravens (Corvus corax).

Christian R Blum, W Tecumseh Fitch, Thomas Bugnyar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian R BlumDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. c.blum0@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4941-7475
W Tecumseh FitchDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-0928
Thomas BugnyarDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. thomas.bugnyar@univie.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-9667
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1262Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredator avoidance can have immense impacts on fitness, yet individual variation in the expression of anti-predator behaviour remains largely unexplained. Existing research investigating learning of novel predators has focused either on individuals or groups, but not both. Testing in individual settings allows evaluations of learning or personality differences, while testing in group settings makes it impossible to distinguish any such individual differences from social dynamics. In this study, we investigate the effect of social dynamics on individual anti-predator behaviour. We trained 15 captive ravens to recognize and respond to a novel experimental predator and then exposed them to this predator in both group and isolation settings across 1.5 years to tease apart individual differences from social effects and evaluate two hypotheses: (1) weaker anti-predator responses of some individuals in the group occurred, because they failed to recognize the experimental predator as a threat, leading to weak responses when separated, or (2) some individuals had learned the new threat, but their scolding intensity was repressed in the group trials due to social dynamics (such as dominance rank), leading to increased scolding intensity when alone.

resultsWe found that dominance significantly influences scolding behaviour in the group trials; top-ranked individuals scold more and earlier than lower ranking ones. However, in the separation trials scolding duration is no longer affected by rank.

conclusionsWe speculate that, while top-ranked individuals use their anti-predator responses to signal status in the group, lower-ranking ravens may be suppressed from, or are less capable of, performing intense anti-predator behaviour while in the group. This suggests that, in addition to its recruitment or predator-deterrent effects, alarm calling may serve as a marker of individual quality to conspecifics.

Indexed as

Alarm callCorvidGroup dynamicsLearningPredator recognitionRaven (Corvus corax)Status signalling

Identifiers

PMID36503565
PMCPMC9743665
OpenAlexW4311125303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.