Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36503505›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2022

Ambulatory negative pressure wound therapy of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery: results of the SAWHI randomized clinical trial.

Dörthe Seidel, SAWHI study group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01528033 (Treatment of Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment After Surgery Without Fascial Dehiscence by Vacuum Assisted Closure™), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01528033 nacompletednot on this map

Treatment of Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment After Surgery Without Fascial Dehiscence by Vacuum Assisted Closure™(SAWHI-V.A.C.® Study) Versus Standard Conventional Wound Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Witten/HerdeckeRan2011 to 2018Enrolled539ConditionsWound Healing Disorder, Impaired Wound Healing, Abdominal Wound Healing Disorder, Abdominal Wound Healing ImpairmentArmsVacuum Assisted Closure®, Standard conventional wound therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dörthe SeidelInstitut Für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany. DoertheSeidel@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2287-5217
SAWHI study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SAWHI study showed that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) reduced treatment time by 7.8 days and had a 20.2% higher wound closure rate, but required a 2.1-day longer hospital stay than conventional wound treatment (CWT). The majority of study participants began treatment in the hospital and were discharged within 42 days.

methodsAs an add-on to a multicenter randomized clinical trial, selected aspects of hospital discharge, outpatient treatment continuation, and subsequent wound closure outcomes are compared between the treatment arms in patients with subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascia dehiscence in the per protocol population.

resultsWithin 42 days, wound closure rates were higher for outpatients in the NPWT arm than for outpatients in the CWT arm (27 of 55 [49.1%]) for both outpatient continuation of NPWT (8 of 26 [30.8%]) and outpatient CWT after NPWT was finished (27 of 121 [22.3%]). Time to wound closure was shorter for outpatients in the NPWT arm (outpatient transfer with: NPWT Mean ± standard error 28.8 ± 8.0 days; CWT 28.9 ± 9.5 days) than in the conventional treatment arm (30.4 ± 8.0 days). Nevertheless, within 30 study sites with patient enrollment, outpatient NPWT was performed in only 20 study sites for 65 of 157 study participants in the treatment arm.

conclusionsOutpatient NPWT of postsurgical abdominal wounds with healing impairment is feasible and successful and should be encouraged whenever possible. Study site specific avoidance of outpatient NPWT emerges as an additional reason for the prolonged hospitalization time. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01528033. Date of registration: February 7, 2012, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyClinical ProtocolsHumansWound HealingAbdomenAmbulatory careNegative pressure wound therapyOutpatientsWound healing

Identifiers

PMID36503505
PMCPMC9743503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.