SynthesisNursing open2023
Development of a knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire on urine leakage with an indwelling urethral catheter for nurses in China.
Synthesis in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire on urine leakage with an indwelling urethral catheter for nurses in China.Nursing open · 2023Pooled it
- Review
- Nurse-Led Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Programme to Reduce Urinary Leakage in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Urinary catheters: A Pre-Post Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimA knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire on urine leakage (UL) with an indwelling urethral catheter (IUC) was developed for nurses in China and validated.
designObservational study.
methodsA systematic literature review, the Delphi method and focus group evaluation were used to develop the questionnaire, which was administered to 304 registered nurses at two hospitals in Guangdong, China. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were assessed.
resultsThe 27-item questionnaire had four dimensions: knowledge I (aetiology), knowledge II (prevention and treatment), attitude and practice. The questionnaire showed excellent content validity and reliability. Four factors accounted for 70.526% of the variance. The data were well-fitted to the four-factor construct model. The questionnaire can be used to measure the knowledge of UL with an IUC among nurses in China, along with related attitudes and practices. This can improve nursing care of patients with IUCs. No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.