Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36502846›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2022

Population-level contribution of interpersonal discrimination to psychological distress among Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults, and to Indigenous-non-Indigenous inequities: cross-sectional analysis of a community-controlled First Nations cohort study.

Katherine A Thurber, Makayla-May Brinckley, Roxanne Jones, Olivia Evans, Kirsty Nichols, Naomi Priest, Shuaijun Guo, David R Williams, Gilbert C Gee, Grace Joshy and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine A ThurberNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia. Electronic address: katherine.thurber@anu.edu.au.
Makayla-May BrinckleyNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Roxanne JonesNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Olivia EvansResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Kirsty NicholsNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Naomi PriestCentre for Social Research and Methods, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia; Centre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Shuaijun GuoCentre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
David R WilliamsDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Gilbert C GeeDepartment of Community Health, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Grace JoshyNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Emily BanksNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Joanne ThandrayenNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Bernard BaffourSchool of Demography, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Janine MohamedThe Lowitja Institute, Collingwood, VIC, Australia.
Tom CalmaUniversity of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Raymond LovettNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Australian National University · AUHarvard University · USMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AU

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD000441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational and population-specific evidence identifies elevated psychological distress prevalence among those experiencing interpersonal discrimination. We aim to quantify the potential whole-of-population contribution of interpersonal discrimination to psychological distress prevalence and Indigenous-non-Indigenous gaps in Australia.

methodsWe did a cross-sectional analysis of data from Mayi Kuwayu: the National Study of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Wellbeing. Baseline surveys were completed between June 8, 2018, and Sept 28, 2022. We analysed responses from participants who were aged 18 years or older at survey completion, whose surveys were processed between Oct 1, 2018, and May 1, 2021. Sample weights were developed on the basis of national population benchmarks. We measured everyday discrimination using an eight-item measure modified from the Everyday Discrimination Scale and classified experiences as racial discrimination if participants attributed these experiences to their Indigeneity. Psychological distress was measured using a validated, modified Kessler-5 scale. Applying logistic regression, we calculated unadjusted odds ratios (ORs), to approximate incident rate ratios (IRRs), for high or very high psychological distress in relation to everyday discrimination and everyday racial discrimination across age-gender strata. Population attributable fractions (PAFs), under the hypothetical assumption that ORs represent causal relationships, were calculated using these ORs and population-level exposure prevalence. These PAFs were used to quantify the contribution of everyday racial discrimination to psychological distress gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous adults.

findings9963 survey responses were eligible for inclusion in our study, of which we analysed 9951 (99·9%); 12 were excluded due to responders identifying as a gender other than man or woman (there were too few responses from this demographic to be included as a category in stratified tables or adjusted analyses). The overall prevalence of psychological distress was 48·3% (95% CI 47·0-49·6) in those experiencing everyday discrimination compared with 25·2% (23·8-26·6) in those experiencing no everyday discrimination (OR 2·77 [95% CI 2·52-3·04]) and psychological distress prevalence was 49·0% (95% CI 47·3-50·6) in those experiencing everyday racial discrimination and 31·8% (30·6-33·1) in those experiencing no everyday racial discrimination (OR 2·06 [95% CI 1·88-2·25]. Overall, 49·3% of the total psychological distress burden among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults could be attributable to everyday discrimination (39·4-58·8% across strata) and 27·1% to everyday racial discrimination. Everyday racial discrimination could explain 47·4% of the overall gap in psychological distress between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people (40·0-60·3% across strata).

interpretationOur findings show that interpersonal discrimination might contribute substantially to psychological distress among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults, and to inequities compared with non-Indigenous adults. Estimated PAFs include contributions from social and health disadvantage, reflecting contributions from structural racism. Although not providing strictly conclusive evidence of causality, this evidence is sufficient to indicate the psychological harm of interpersonal discrimination. Findings add weight to imperatives to combat discrimination and structural racism at its core. Urgent individual and policy action is required of non-Indigenous people and colonial structures, directed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

fundingNational Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Ian Potter Foundation, Australian Research Council, US National Institutes of Health, and Sierra Foundation.

Indexed as

Psychological DistressAdultAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID36502846
PMCPMC9807286
OpenAlexW4311674406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.