Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36502623›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2023

Integrated surveillance of human respiratory viruses in addition to SARS-CoV-2 in a public testing facility in the Netherlands.

N L Plantinga, M C J van Lanschot, C F H Raven, R Schuurman, A F Rirash, B van Deursen, G J Boland, T O Siksma, E Fries, M Mostert and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improving public health laboratory preparedness at European Union level: learning points from experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

N L PlantingaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands. Electronic address: N.L.Plantinga@umcutrecht.nl.
M C J van LanschotDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Utrecht region, Netherlands.
C F H RavenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Utrecht region, Netherlands.
R SchuurmanDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
A F RirashDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Utrecht region, Netherlands.
B van DeursenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Utrecht region, Netherlands.
G J BolandDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
T O SiksmaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
E FriesDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
M MostertDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Netherlands.
S F T ThijsenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Netherlands.
L M HofstraDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-CoV-2 prevention measures impact the circulation of other respiratory viruses. Surveillance in the network of general practitioners is hampered by widespread testing for SARS-CoV-2 in public testing facilities.

objectivesTo evaluate integrated community surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses and describe epidemiological trends. STUDY

designRespiratory surveillance was set up within an existing SARS-CoV-2 public testing facility. Community-dwelling (a)symptomatic persons provided consent for completion of a questionnaire and additional testing on residual material from swabs taken for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR (Allplex Seegene). Daily, a random subset was tested for sixteen respiratory viruses by multiplex realtime PCRs (Seegene).

resultsBetween October 6th (week 40) 2021 and April 22nd (week 16) 2022, 3,969 subjects were tested. The weekly median age ranged from 23 to 39 years. The prevalence of respiratory symptoms ranged from 98.5% (week 40) to 27.4% (week 1). The prevalence of detection of any respiratory virus (including SARS-CoV-2), ranged from 19.6% in week 49 to 75.3% in week 14. SARS-CoV-2 prevalence ranged from 2.2% (week 40) to 63.3% (week 14). Overall, SARS-CoV-2 was detected most frequently (27.3%), followed by rhinoviruses (14.6%, range 3.5-47.8%) and seasonal coronaviruses (3.7%, range 0-10.4%, mostly 229E and OC43). Influenzavirus was detected in 3.0% of participants from week 6 onwards.

conclusionsIntegrated respiratory viral surveillance within public testing facilities is feasible and informative. Prevalences may be affected by changes in SARS-CoV-2 prevention and testing policies. Population characteristics help to interpret trends over time. Integrated surveillance may inform policymakers and hospitals for adequate response measures during respiratory seasons.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultCOVID-19 TestingHumansNetherlandsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionYoung AdultInfluenzavirusPublic health testing facilityRespiratory virusesRS-virusSars-CoV-2Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID36502623
PMCPMC9699712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.