Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36502513›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Antenatal prediction models for outcomes of extremely and very preterm infants based on machine learning.

Takafumi Ushida, Tomomi Kotani, Joji Baba, Kenji Imai, Yoshinori Moriyama, Tomoko Nakano-Kobayashi, Yukako Iitani, Noriyuki Nakamura, Masahiro Hayakawa, Hiroaki Kajiyama and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Development of a machine learning model for prediction of intraventricular hemorrhage in premature neonates.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Takafumi UshidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan. u-taka23@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8042-5919
Tomomi KotaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Joji BabaEducation Software Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji ImaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Yoshinori MoriyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Tomoko Nakano-KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seirei Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yukako IitaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Noriyuki NakamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Masahiro HayakawaDivision of Neonatology, Center for Maternal-Neonatal Care, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroaki KajiyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Neonatal Research Network of Japan
Nagoya University · JPNagoya University Hospital · JPEducation software (Japan) · JPFujita Health University · JPSeirei Social Welfare Community · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePredicting individual risks for adverse outcomes in preterm infants is necessary for perinatal management and antenatal counseling for their parents. To evaluate whether a machine learning approach can improve the prediction of severe infant outcomes beyond the performance of conventional logistic models, and to identify maternal and fetal factors that largely contribute to these outcomes.

methodsA population-based retrospective study was performed using clinical data of 31,157 infants born at < 32 weeks of gestation and weighing ≤ 1500 g, registered in the Neonatal Research Network of Japan between 2006 and 2015. We developed a conventional logistic model and 6 types of machine learning models based on 12 maternal and fetal factors. Discriminative ability was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs), and the importance of each factor in terms of its contribution to outcomes was evaluated using the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) value.

resultsThe AUROCs of the most discriminative machine learning models were better than those of the conventional models for all outcomes. The AUROCs for in-hospital death and short-term adverse outcomes in the gradient boosting decision tree were significantly higher than those in the conventional model (p = 0.015 and p = 0.002, respectively). The SHAP value analyses showed that gestational age, birth weight, and antenatal corticosteroid treatment were the three most important factors associated with severe infant outcomes.

conclusionMachine learning models improve the prediction of severe infant outcomes. Moreover, the machine learning approach provides insight into the potential risk factors for severe infant outcomes.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHospital MortalityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMachine LearningPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAntenatal counselingMachine learningNeonatal outcomesPreterm birthRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID36502513
OpenAlexW4311116338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.