ReviewEmerging infectious diseases2022
Global Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Review in Emerging infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparative Analysis of National Health Strategies and Policy Documents in Selected Latin American and African Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Trends and disparities in HIV before and after COVID-19 from 1999 to 2023.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Pandemic and epidemic intelligence innovation forum: bridging gaps in epidemic intelligence through global collaboration.BMC proceedings · 2025Article
- Pathways to strengthening the epidemic intelligence workforce.BMC proceedings · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Comparative Evaluation between a Specialized Center and Conventional Hospitals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Partnerships, Collaborations, and Investments Integral to CDC's International Response to COVID-19.Emerging infectious diseases · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.