Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36502372›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023

Inpactor2: a software based on deep learning to identify and classify LTR-retrotransposons in plant genomes.

Simon Orozco-Arias, Luis Humberto Lopez-Murillo, Mariana S Candamil-Cortés, Maradey Arias, Paula A Jaimes, Alexandre Rossi Paschoal, Reinel Tabares-Soto, Gustavo Isaza, Romain Guyot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simon Orozco-AriasDepartment of Computer Science, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, 170001, Caldas, Colombia.
Luis Humberto Lopez-MurilloDepartment of Computer Science, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, 170001, Caldas, Colombia.
Mariana S Candamil-CortésDepartment of Computer Science, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, 170001, Caldas, Colombia.
Maradey AriasDepartment of Computer Science, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, 170001, Caldas, Colombia.
Paula A JaimesDepartment of Computer Science, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, 170001, Caldas, Colombia.
Alexandre Rossi PaschoalBioinformatics and Pattern Recognition Group, Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology (UTFPR) - Paraná, 80230-901, Paraná, Brazil.
Reinel Tabares-SotoDepartment of Electronics and Automation, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, 170001, Caldas, Colombia.
Gustavo IsazaDepartment of Systems and Informatics, Center for Technology Development - Bioprocess and Agro-industry Plant, Universidad de Caldas, 170004, Caldas, Colombia.
Romain GuyotDepartment of Electronics and Automation, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, 170001, Caldas, Colombia.

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation 785/2017Universidad Autónoma de Manizales 752-115Universidad de Caldas 0319120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LTR-retrotransposons are the most abundant repeat sequences in plant genomes and play an important role in evolution and biodiversity. Their characterization is of great importance to understand their dynamics. However, the identification and classification of these elements remains a challenge today. Moreover, current software can be relatively slow (from hours to days), sometimes involve a lot of manual work and do not reach satisfactory levels in terms of precision and sensitivity. Here we present Inpactor2, an accurate and fast application that creates LTR-retrotransposon reference libraries in a very short time. Inpactor2 takes an assembled genome as input and follows a hybrid approach (deep learning and structure-based) to detect elements, filter partial sequences and finally classify intact sequences into superfamilies and, as very few tools do, into lineages. This tool takes advantage of multi-core and GPU architectures to decrease execution times. Using the rice genome, Inpactor2 showed a run time of 5 minutes (faster than other tools) and has the best accuracy and F1-Score of the tools tested here, also having the second best accuracy and specificity only surpassed by EDTA, but achieving 28% higher sensitivity. For large genomes, Inpactor2 is up to seven times faster than other available bioinformatics tools.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRetroelementsEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantPhylogenySoftwareTerminal Repeat SequencesRetroelementsclassificationdeep learningdetectionInpactor2LTR-retrotransposonsneural networksplant genomes

Identifiers

PMID36502372
PMCPMC9851300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.