Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36502169›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

AI-Based Detection of Aspiration for Video-Endoscopy with Visual Aids in Meaningful Frames to Interpret the Model Outcome.

Jürgen Konradi, Milla Zajber, Ulrich Betz, Philipp Drees, Annika Gerken, Hans Meine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jürgen KonradiInstitute of Physical Therapy, Prevention and Rehabilitation, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2297-3482
Milla ZajberDepartment for Health Care & Nursing, Catholic University of Applied Sciences, 55122 Mainz, Germany.
Ulrich BetzInstitute of Physical Therapy, Prevention and Rehabilitation, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-4287
Philipp DreesDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Annika GerkenFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4327-6352
Hans MeineFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-5007
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine · DECatholic University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disorders of swallowing often lead to pneumonia when material enters the airways (aspiration). Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) plays a key role in the diagnostics of aspiration but is prone to human errors. An AI-based tool could facilitate this process. Recent non-endoscopic/non-radiologic attempts to detect aspiration using machine-learning approaches have led to unsatisfying accuracy and show black-box characteristics. Hence, for clinical users it is difficult to trust in these model decisions. Our aim is to introduce an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach to detect aspiration in FEES. Our approach is to teach the AI about the relevant anatomical structures, such as the vocal cords and the glottis, based on 92 annotated FEES videos. Simultaneously, it is trained to detect boluses that pass the glottis and become aspirated. During testing, the AI successfully recognized the glottis and the vocal cords but could not yet achieve satisfying aspiration detection quality. While detection performance must be optimized, our architecture results in a final model that explains its assessment by locating meaningful frames with relevant aspiration events and by highlighting suspected boluses. In contrast to comparable AI tools, our framework is verifiable and interpretable and, therefore, accountable for clinical users.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersArtificial IntelligenceAudiovisual AidsDeglutitionEndoscopyHumansaspirationdetectionendoscopyFEESglottisinterpretabilitykey framesmeaningful sequencessegmentationvocal cordsXAI

Identifiers

PMID36502169
PMCPMC9736280
OpenAlexW4311627249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.