Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36502143›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Validity and Reliability of a New Intelligent Three-Dimensional Gait Analysis System in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Post-Stroke.

Yingpeng Wang, Ran Tang, Hujun Wang, Xin Yu, Yingqi Li, Congxiao Wang, Luyi Wang, Shuyan Qie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingpeng WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Ran TangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Hujun WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4446-6657
Xin YuBeijing Rehabilitation Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Yingqi LiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Congxiao WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Luyi WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Shuyan QieDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University 2021-006Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University 2021-077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Odonate is a new, intelligent three-dimensional gait analysis system based on binocular depth cameras and neural networks, but its accuracy has not been validated. Twenty-six healthy subjects and sixteen patients with post-stroke were recruited to investigate the validity and reliability of Odonate for gait analysis and examine its ability to discriminate abnormal gait patterns. The repeatability tests of different raters and different days showed great consistency. Compared with the results measured by Vicon, gait velocity, cadence, step length, cycle time, and sagittal hip and knee joint angles measured by Odonate showed high consistency, while the consistency of the gait phase division and the sagittal ankle joint angle was slightly lower. In addition, the stages with statistical differences between healthy subjects and patients during a gait cycle measured by the two systems were consistent. In conclusion, Odonate has excellent inter/intra-rater reliability, and has strong validity in measuring some spatiotemporal parameters and the sagittal joint angles, except the gait phase division and the ankle joint angle. Odonate is comparable to Vicon in its ability to identify abnormal gait patterns in patients with post-stroke. Therefore, Odonate has the potential to provide accessible and objective measurements for clinical gait assessment.

Indexed as

Gait AnalysisStrokeBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansKnee JointReproducibility of Resultsgait analysisOdonatereliabilitystrokevalidity

Identifiers

PMID36502143
PMCPMC9740023
OpenAlexW4311628425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.