Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36502115›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Fog-Assisted Deep-Learning-Empowered Intrusion Detection System for RPL-Based Resource-Constrained Smart Industries.

Danish Attique, Hao Wang, Ping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danish AttiqueCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China.
Hao WangDepartment of Automation, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China.
Ping WangDepartment of Automation, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a prominent and advanced network communication technology that has familiarized the world with smart industries. The conveniently acquirable nature of IoT makes it susceptible to a diversified range of potential security threats. The literature has brought forth a plethora of solutions for ensuring secure communications in IoT-based smart industries. However, resource-constrained sectors still demand significant attention. We have proposed a fog-assisted deep learning (DL)-empowered intrusion detection system (IDS) for resource-constrained smart industries. The proposed Cuda-deep neural network gated recurrent unit (Cu-DNNGRU) framework was trained on the N-BaIoT dataset and was evaluated on judicious performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Additionally, the Cu-DNNGRU was empirically investigated alongside state-of-the-art classifiers, including Cu-LSTMDNN, Cu-BLSTM, and Cu-GRU. An extensive performance comparison was also undertaken among the proposed IDS and some outstanding solutions from the literature. The simulation results showed ample strength with respect to the validation of the proposed framework. The proposed Cu-DNNGRU achieved 99.39% accuracy, 99.09% precision, 98.89% recall, and an F1-score of 99.21%. In the performance comparison, the values were substantially higher than those of the benchmarked schemes, as well as competitive security solutions from the literature.

Indexed as

Deep LearningInternet of ThingsCommunicationIndustrydeep learning (DL)fog computingIndustrial Internet of Things (IIoT)intrusion detection system (IDS)RPL

Identifiers

PMID36502115
PMCPMC9735641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.