Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36502092›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Customized Textile Capacitive Insole Sensor for Center of Pressure Analysis.

Jong-Gab Ho, Young Kim, Se-Dong Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jong-Gab HoDepartment of Software Convergence, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0345-174X
Young KimDepartment of Software Convergence, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0043-1623
Se-Dong MinDepartment of Software Convergence, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9112-2673

Funding

Ministry of Education 5199990914048National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1I1A3059769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Center of pressure refers to the centroid of the ground reaction force vector detected underneath the walking foot, which is a summary measure representing body segment movements during human locomotion. In this study, we developed a cost-effective, lightweight insole-type textile capacitive sensor (I-TCPs) to analyze plantar pressure (PP) distribution and center of pressure (COP) trajectory. To test the accuracy of I-TCPs, the measured pressure data was compared with that of F-scan. The sensor performance test was divided into a static baseline test and a dynamic gait experiment, both at two different gait speeds self-selected by the subjects. Static gait results showed that I-TCPs were capable of recognizing PP segments at different gait speeds. Dynamic gait results showed an average RMSE of 1.29 ± 0.47 mm in COPx (mediolateral shift) and 12.55 ± 5.08 mm in COPy (anteroposterior shift) at a comfortable gait speed. The COP correlation between I-TCPs and F-scan was 0.54 ± 0.09 in COPx and 0.92 ± 0.04 in COPy in comfortable gait speed conditions, in which COPy values presented a stronger correlation. RMSE and correlation in fast gait speed conditions also showed similar results. The findings of this study can be the basis for future research, including rehabilitation engineering, developing ICT devices, and creating smart wearable sensors to improve quality of life for patients and healthy individuals.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeShoesBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansPressureWalkingcenter of pressuregaitinsoletextile capacitive pressure sensorwearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID36502092
PMCPMC9739635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.