Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36501947›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Electronic Nose Sensor Drift Affects Diagnostic Reliability and Accuracy of Disease-Specific Algorithms.

Sofie Bosch, Renée X de Menezes, Suzanne Pees, Dion J Wintjens, Margien Seinen, Gerd Bouma, Johan Kuyvenhoven, Pieter C F Stokkers, Tim G J de Meij, Nanne K H de Boer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sofie BoschDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AG&M Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9202-1674
Renée X de MenezesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzanne PeesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AG&M Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dion J WintjensDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), 6229 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Margien SeinenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG West, 1061 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerd BoumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AG&M Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan KuyvenhovenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, 2134 Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Pieter C F StokkersDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG West, 1061 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tim G J de MeijDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nanne K H de BoerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AG&M Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8357-9887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensor drift is a well-known disadvantage of electronic nose (eNose) technology and may affect the accuracy of diagnostic algorithms. Correction for this phenomenon is not routinely performed. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of eNose sensor drift on the development of a disease-specific algorithm in a real-life cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients (IBD). In this multi-center cohort, patients undergoing colonoscopy collected a fecal sample prior to bowel lavage. Mucosal disease activity was assessed based on endoscopy. Controls underwent colonoscopy for various reasons and had no endoscopic abnormalities. Fecal eNose profiles were measured using Cyranose 320®. Fecal samples of 63 IBD patients and 63 controls were measured on four subsequent days. Sensor data displayed associations with date of measurement, which was reproducible across all samples irrespective of disease state, disease activity state, disease localization and diet of participants. Based on logistic regression, corrections for sensor drift improved accuracy to differentiate between IBD patients and controls based on the significant differences of six sensors (p = 0.004; p < 0.001; p = 0.001; p = 0.028; p < 0.001 and p = 0.005) with an accuracy of 0.68. In this clinical study, short-term sensor drift affected fecal eNose profiles more profoundly than clinical features. These outcomes emphasize the importance of sensor drift correction to improve reliability and repeatability, both within and across eNose studies.

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesVolatile Organic CompoundsBreath TestsElectronic NoseExhalationHumansReproducibility of ResultsVolatile Organic Compoundsdiagnosticelectronic noseinflammatory bowel diseasesensor driftvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID36501947
PMCPMC9740993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.