ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Electronic Nose Sensor Drift Affects Diagnostic Reliability and Accuracy of Disease-Specific Algorithms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models linking traditional Chinese medicine knowledge and clinical practice.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Adaptive E-Nose: Integrating New Gas Sensors for Emerging Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Presence-gated VOC sensing for urban search and rescue applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal AI for Real-Time Food Safety and Quality: From Sensors to Foundation Models, Edge Deployment, and Regulation.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Hybrid mechanistic-machine learning PK/PD models with digital biomarkers: from cage to clinic.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence: A prospective evaluation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Research Communication: Breath Testing for Colorectal Cancer Detection in Patients With a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Multicentre Prospective Cross-Sectional Study With External Validation.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Use of a Novel Passive E-Nose to Monitor Fermentable Prebiotic Fiber Consumption.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of a Multi-Gas Detector for Monitoring Gas Composition in Minced Beef During Storage.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Developments of Recent Applications for Early Diagnosis of Diseases Using Electronic-Nose and Other VOC-Detection Devices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Potential for Early Noninvasive COVID-19 Detection Using Electronic-Nose Technologies and Disease-Specific VOC Metabolic Biomarkers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensor drift is a well-known disadvantage of electronic nose (eNose) technology and may affect the accuracy of diagnostic algorithms. Correction for this phenomenon is not routinely performed. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of eNose sensor drift on the development of a disease-specific algorithm in a real-life cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients (IBD). In this multi-center cohort, patients undergoing colonoscopy collected a fecal sample prior to bowel lavage. Mucosal disease activity was assessed based on endoscopy. Controls underwent colonoscopy for various reasons and had no endoscopic abnormalities. Fecal eNose profiles were measured using Cyranose 320®. Fecal samples of 63 IBD patients and 63 controls were measured on four subsequent days. Sensor data displayed associations with date of measurement, which was reproducible across all samples irrespective of disease state, disease activity state, disease localization and diet of participants. Based on logistic regression, corrections for sensor drift improved accuracy to differentiate between IBD patients and controls based on the significant differences of six sensors (p = 0.004; p < 0.001; p = 0.001; p = 0.028; p < 0.001 and p = 0.005) with an accuracy of 0.68. In this clinical study, short-term sensor drift affected fecal eNose profiles more profoundly than clinical features. These outcomes emphasize the importance of sensor drift correction to improve reliability and repeatability, both within and across eNose studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.