Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36501942›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Simultaneous Gut-Brain Electrophysiology Shows Cognition and Satiety Specific Coupling.

Pragathi Priyadharsini Balasubramani, Anuja Walke, Gillian Grennan, Andrew Perley, Suzanna Purpura, Dhakshin Ramanathan, Todd P Coleman, Jyoti Mishra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pragathi Priyadharsini BalasubramaniNeural Engineering and Translation Labs (NEATLabs), Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Anuja WalkeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Gillian GrennanNeural Engineering and Translation Labs (NEATLabs), Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Andrew PerleyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Suzanna PurpuraNeural Engineering and Translation Labs (NEATLabs), Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Dhakshin RamanathanNeural Engineering and Translation Labs (NEATLabs), Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Todd P ColemanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Jyoti MishraNeural Engineering and Translation Labs (NEATLabs), Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6612-4557
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

Kavli Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies, using high resolution magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electrogastrography (EGG), have shown that during resting state, rhythmic gastric physiological signals are linked with cortical brain oscillations. Yet, gut-brain coupling has not been investigated with electroencephalography (EEG) during cognitive brain engagement or during hunger-related gut engagement. In this study in 14 young adults (7 females, mean ± SD age 25.71 ± 8.32 years), we study gut-brain coupling using simultaneous EEG and EGG during hunger and satiety states measured in separate visits, and compare responses both while resting as well as during a cognitively demanding working memory task. We find that EGG-EEG phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) differs based on both satiety state and cognitive effort, with greater PAC modulation observed in the resting state relative to working memory. We find a significant interaction between gut satiation levels and cognitive states in the left fronto-central brain region, with larger cognitive demand based differences in the hunger state. Furthermore, strength of PAC correlated with behavioral performance during the working memory task. Altogether, these results highlight the role of gut-brain interactions in cognition and demonstrate the feasibility of these recordings using scalable sensors.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyRestYoung AdultEEGelectrogastrographyphase-amplitude couplingresting stateworking memory

Identifiers

PMID36501942
PMCPMC9737783
OpenAlexW4310154289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.