Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36501867›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Multi-Defect Detection in Additively Manufactured Lattice Structures Using 3D Electrical Resistance Tomography.

Yening Shu, Saptarshi Mukherjee, Tammy Chang, Abigail Gilmore, Joseph W Tringe, David M Stobbe, Kenneth J Loh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yening ShuDepartment of Structural Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2615-0827
Saptarshi MukherjeeLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Tammy ChangLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Abigail GilmoreLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Joseph W TringeLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
David M StobbeLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Kenneth J LohDepartment of Structural Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-6251
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 19-ENG-008United States Department of Energy DE-AC52-07NA27344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular lattice structures possess high strength-to-weight ratios suitable for advanced lightweight engineering applications. However, their quality and mechanical performance can degrade because of defects introduced during manufacturing or in-service. Their complexity and small length scale features make defects difficult to detect using conventional nondestructive evaluation methods. Here we propose a current injection-based method, electrical resistance tomography (ERT), that can be used to detect damaged struts in conductive cellular lattice structures with their intrinsic electromechanical properties. The reconstructed conductivity distributions from ERT can reveal the severity and location of damaged struts without having to probe each strut. However, the low central sensitivity of ERT may result in image artifacts and inaccurate localization of damaged struts. To address this issue, this study introduces an absolute, high throughput, conductivity reconstruction algorithm for 3D ERT. The algorithm incorporates a strut-based normalized sensitivity map to compensate for lower interior sensitivity and suppresses reconstruction artifacts. Numerical simulations and experiments on fabricated representative cellular lattice structures were performed to verify the ability of ERT to quantitatively identify single and multiple damaged struts. The improved performance of this method compared with classical ERT was observed, based on greatly decreased imaging and reconstructed value errors.

Indexed as

ArtifactsTomographyAlgorithmsElectric ConductivityElectric Impedance3D printingabsolute imagingdamage identificationERTnondestructive evaluationsensitivity matrix

Identifiers

PMID36501867
PMCPMC9736320
OpenAlexW4310057254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.