Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36501828›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Security in V2I Communications: A Systematic Literature Review.

Pablo Marcillo, Diego Tamayo-Urgilés, Ángel Leonardo Valdivieso Caraguay, Myriam Hernández-Álvarez

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pablo MarcilloDepartamento de Informática y Ciencias de la Computación, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ladrón de Guevara E11-25 y Andalucía, Edificio de Sistemas, Quito 170525, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-2647-7478
Diego Tamayo-UrgilésDepartamento de Informática y Ciencias de la Computación, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ladrón de Guevara E11-25 y Andalucía, Edificio de Sistemas, Quito 170525, Ecuador.
Ángel Leonardo Valdivieso CaraguayDepartamento de Informática y Ciencias de la Computación, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ladrón de Guevara E11-25 y Andalucía, Edificio de Sistemas, Quito 170525, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-3502-020X
Myriam Hernández-ÁlvarezDepartamento de Informática y Ciencias de la Computación, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ladrón de Guevara E11-25 y Andalucía, Edificio de Sistemas, Quito 170525, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-4718-0400
National Polytechnic School · EC

Funding

National Polytechnic School PIS 20-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the number of vehicles equipped with wireless connections has increased considerably. The impact of that growth in areas such as telecommunications, infotainment, and automatic driving is enormous. More and more drivers want to be part of a vehicular network, despite the implications or risks that, for instance, the openness of wireless communications, its dynamic topology, and its considerable size may bring. Undoubtedly, this trend is because of the benefits the vehicular network can offer. Generally, a vehicular network has two modes of communication (V2I and V2V). The advantage of V2I over V2V is roadside units' high computational and transmission power, which assures the functioning of early warning and driving guidance services. This paper aims to discover the principal vulnerabilities and challenges in V2I communications, the tools and methods to mitigate those vulnerabilities, the evaluation metrics to measure the effectiveness of those tools and methods, and based on those metrics, the methods or tools that provide the best results. Researchers have identified the non-resistance to attacks, the regular updating and exposure of keys, and the high dependence on certification authorities as main vulnerabilities. Thus, the authors found schemes resistant to attacks, authentication schemes, privacy protection models, and intrusion detection and prevention systems. Of the solutions for providing security analyzed in this review, the authors determined that most of them use metrics such as computational cost and communication overhead to measure their performance. Additionally, they determined that the solutions that use emerging technologies such as fog/edge/cloud computing present better results than the rest. Finally, they established that the principal challenge in V2I communication is to protect and dispose of a safe and reliable communication channel to avoid adversaries taking control of the medium.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialityCloud ComputingCommunicationComputer Communication NetworksauthenticationconfidentialityintegrityprivacysecurityV2IVANET

Identifiers

PMID36501828
PMCPMC9741211
OpenAlexW4310043256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.