Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36501779›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Classification Models of Action Research Arm Test Activities in Post-Stroke Patients Based on Human Hand Motion.

Jesus Fernando Padilla-Magaña, Esteban Peña-Pitarch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jesus Fernando Padilla-MagañaEscola Politècnica Superior d'Enginyeria de Manresa (EPSEM), Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), 08242 Manresa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7529-2122
Esteban Peña-PitarchEscola Politècnica Superior d'Enginyeria de Manresa (EPSEM), Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), 08242 Manresa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5986-5728
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) presents a ceiling effect that prevents the detection of improvements produced with rehabilitation treatments in stroke patients with mild finger joint impairments. The aim of this study was to develop classification models to predict whether activities with similar ARAT scores were performed by a healthy subject or by a subject post-stroke using the extension and flexion angles of 11 finger joints as features. For this purpose, we used three algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). The dataset presented class imbalance, and the classification models presented a low recall, especially in the stroke class. Therefore, we implemented class balance using Borderline-SMOTE. After data balancing the classification models showed significantly higher accuracy, recall, f1-score, and AUC. However, after data balancing, the SVM classifier showed a higher performance with a precision of 98%, a recall of 97.5%, and an AUC of 0.996. The results showed that classification models based on human hand motion features in combination with the oversampling algorithm Borderline-SMOTE achieve higher performance. Furthermore, our study suggests that there are differences in ARAT activities performed between healthy and post-stroke individuals that are not detected by the ARAT scoring process.

Indexed as

StrokeUpper ExtremityAlgorithmsHandHealth Services ResearchHumansSupport Vector Machineborderline-SMOTEclassificationfinger jointshand motionmachine learningstroke

Identifiers

PMID36501779
PMCPMC9737603
OpenAlexW4309728848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.