Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36501764›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Gamma Radiation Dose Measurement Using an Energy-Selective Method with the Help of a Drone.

András Molnár

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risks of Drone Use in Light of Literature Studies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

András MolnárJohn von Neumann Faculty of Informatics, Obuda University, Becsi ut 96/b, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4330-6547

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several dose distribution maps were obtained using a gamma radiation detector mounted to a drone. Based on the results and experience of the experiments, the shortcomings of the system and the possibilities for further development were identified. The primary goal of the development was to create a more compact, easy-to-carry, and easy-to-install system with increased sensitivity, which was achieved by several different methods and their combinations. During the discrete measurement procedure, the aim was to decrease the detection threshold, +0.005 to +0.007 μS/h measured above the background radiation. The increase in sensitivity was based on the characteristic energy spectrum of radiative materials. We took advantage of the fact that the radiating samples do not evenly increase the amount of gamma radiation over the entire energy spectrum. During the processing of the measurement data, we performed a comparison with the background radiation in the vicinity of the energy peaks characteristic of the sample and its decay products. This provides a better signal-to-noise ratio, thus enabling a more sensitive detection procedure. An important feature of our method is that in the traditional intensity curve displayed as a function of flight time only noise is visible, therefore one cannot directly conclude the presence of the sample. However, our method is clearly able to identify the location of the searched source at a height of 8 m with a continuous flight speed of 2 m/s using a 500 μS/h activity sample (as measured at a distance of 0.1 m from the sample). The increase in sensitivity allows either a higher scanning height (approximately +1 to 2 m) or, in the case of the same aircraft at the same altitude, a larger area from one take-off. Of course, the scan height or scan speed can increase significantly if the activity of the source being sought is high. In our experiments, we used a natural uranium mineral (Autunite) with activity far below that of artificially produced isotopes. In the series of our experiments, we also covered the detection of several sources, which modeled the possibility of mapping scattered active sources. The main advantages of the system developed and presented by us over the survey procedures used in practice is that a large area can be mobilized easily, without the risk of a human operator in the field, and the survey of a large area can be carried out at a low cost. The purpose of the system is to detect the presence of the source and to localize it to such an extent that the localization can then be easily refined by manual or other ground procedures. As we do not aim for positioning accuracy by centimeter, standard GPS localization is sufficient for the measurements. During the measurements, the geographical coordinates are interpreted in the GWS'84 system. The coordinates of the latitude and longitude circles are also shown in this system in the figures presented.

Indexed as

AircraftGamma RaysHumansoutdoor dose distribution measurementradioactive radiation mapping with a droneradioactive radiation measurement with drone

Identifiers

PMID36501764
PMCPMC9738401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.