ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
RSSI Fingerprint Height Based Empirical Model Prediction for Smart Indoor Localization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neural Network-Based LoRa Received Signal Strength Indicator Fingerprint Identification for Indoor Localization of Mobile Robots.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhanced Indoor Positioning Using RSSI and Time-Distributed Auto Encoder-Gated Recurrent Unit Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Smart indoor living advances in the recent decade, such as home indoor localization and positioning, has seen a significant need for low-cost localization systems based on freely available resources such as Received Signal Strength Indicator by the dense deployment of Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN). The off-the-shelf user equipment (UE's) available at an affordable price across the globe are well equipped with the functionality to scan the radio access network for hearable single strength; in complex indoor environments, multiple signals can be received at a particular reference point with no consideration of the height of the transmitter and possible broadcasting coverage. Most effective fingerprinting algorithm solutions require specialized labor, are time-consuming to carry out site surveys, training of the data, big data analysis, and in most cases, additional hardware requirements relatively increase energy consumption and cost, not forgetting that in case of changes in the indoor environment will highly affect the fingerprint due to interferences. This paper experimentally evaluates and proposes a novel technique for Received Signal Indicator (RSSI) distance prediction, leveraging transceiver height, and Fresnel ranging in a complex indoor environment to better suit the path loss of RSSI at a particular Reference Point (RP) and time, which further contributes greatly to indoor localization. The experimentation in different complex indoor environments of the corridor and office lab during work hours to ascertain real-life and time feasibility shows that the technique's accuracy is greatly improved in the office room and the corridor, achieving lower average prediction errors at low-cost than the comparison prediction algorithms. Compared with the conventional prediction techniques, for example, with Access Point 1 (AP1), the proposed Height Dependence Path-Loss (HEM) model at 0 dBm error attains a confidence probability of 10.98%, higher than the 2.65% for the distance dependence of Path-Loss New Empirical Model (NEM), 4.2% for the Multi-Wall dependence on Path-Loss (MWM) model, and 0% for the Conventional one-slope Path-Loss (OSM) model, respectively. Online localization, amongst the hearable APs, it is seen the proposed HEM fingerprint localization based on the proposed HEM prediction model attains a confidence probability of 31% at 3 m, 55% at 6 m, 78% at 9 m, outperforming the NEM with 26%, 43%, 62%, 62%, the MWM with 23%, 43%, 66%, respectively. The robustness of the HEM fingerprint using diverse predicted test samples by the NEM and MWM models indicates better localization of 13% than comparison fingerprints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.