ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Balancing of Motor Armature Based on LSTM-ZPF Signal Processing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Signal processing is important in the balancing of the motor armature, where the balancing accuracy depends on the extraction of the signal amplitude and phase from the raw vibration signal. In this study, a motor armature dynamic balancing method based on the long short-term memory network (LSTM) and zero-phase filter (ZPF) is proposed. This method mainly focuses on the extraction accuracy of amplitude and phase from unbalanced signals of the motor armature. The ZPF is used to accurately extract the phase, while the LSTM network is trained to extract the amplitude. The proposed method combines the advantages of both methods, whereby the problems of phase shift and amplitude loss when used alone are solved, and the motor armature unbalance signal is accurately obtained. The unbalanced mass and phase are calculated using the influence coefficient method. The effectiveness of the proposed method is proven using the simulated motor armature vibration signal, and an experimental investigation is undertaken to verify the dynamic balancing method. Two amplitude evaluation metrics and three phase evaluation metrics are proposed to judge the extraction accuracy of the amplitude and phase, whereas amplitude and frequency spectrum analysis are used to judge the dynamic balancing results. The results illustrate that the proposed method has higher dynamic balancing accuracy. Moreover, it has better extraction accuracy for the amplitude and phase of unbalanced signals compared with other methods, and it has good anti-noise performance. The determination coefficient of the amplitude is 0.9999, and the average absolute error of the phase is 2.4°. The proposed method considers both fidelity and denoising, which ensuring the accuracy of armature dynamic balancing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.