ArticlePolymers2022
Efficient Physical Mixing of Small Amounts of Nanosilica Dispersion and Waterborne Polyurethane by Using Mild Stirring Conditions.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Multifunctional Polymer-Based Nanocomposites.Polymers · 2024Article
- Morphology, Micromechanical, and Macromechanical Properties of Novel Waterborne Poly(urethane-urea)/Silica Nanocomposites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Good dispersion of nanosilica particles in waterborne polyurethane was obtained by mild mechanical stirring when 0.1-0.5 wt.% nanosilica in aqueous dispersion was added. The addition of small amounts of nanosilica produced more negative Z-potential values, increased the surface tension and decreased the Brookfield viscosity, as well as the extent of shear thinning of the waterborne polyurethane. Depending on the amount of nanosilica, the particle-size distributions of the waterborne polyurethanes changed differently and the addition of only 0.1 wt.% nanosilica noticeably increased the percentage of the particles of 298 nm in diameter. The DSC curves showed two melting peaks at 46 °C and 52 °C, as well as an increase in the melting enthalpy. In addition, when nanosilica was added, the crystallization peak of the waterborne polyurethane was displaced to a higher temperature and showed higher enthalpy. Furthermore, the addition of 0.1-0.5 wt.% nanosilica displaced the temperature of decomposition of the soft domains to higher temperatures due to the intercalation of the particles among the soft segments; this led to a change in the degree of phase separation of the waterborne polyurethanes. As a consequence, improved thermal stability and viscoelastic and mechanical properties of the waterborne polyurethanes were obtained. However, the addition of small amounts of nanosilica was detrimental for the wettability and adhesion of the waterborne polyurethanes due to the existence of acrylic moieties on the nanosilica particles, which seemed to migrate to the interface once the polyurethane was cross-linked. In fact, the final T-peel strength values of the joints made with the waterborne polyurethanes containing nanosilica were significantly lower than the one obtained with the waterborne polyurethane without nanosilica; the higher the nanosilica content, the lower the final adhesion. The better the nanosilica dispersion in the waterborne polyurethane+nanosilica, the higher the final T-peel strength value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.