Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36501431›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Contrasting Responses of Alien and Ancient Forest Indicator Plant Species to Fragmentation Process in the Temperate Lowland Forests.

Mirjana Šipek, Lado Kutnar, Aleksander Marinšek, Nina Šajna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mirjana ŠipekFaculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-4787-902X
Lado KutnarSlovenian Forestry Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-9785-1263
Aleksander MarinšekSlovenian Forestry Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nina ŠajnaFaculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-7830-5424

Funding

EEA Financial Mechanism 2009-2014 (SI02) and Government Office for Development and European Cohesion Policy of the Republic of Slovenia GoForMuraMinistry of Higher Education, Science and Technology J1-2457Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology P1-0403Slovenian Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food JGS task 1/2Slovenian Research Agency P4-0107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragmentation is one of the major threats to biodiversity. In a fragmented landscape, forest specialists are losing suitable forest habitats with specific site and microclimate conditions, which results in their local extinction. Conversely, the invasion of alien species is facilitated by open forest areas and increased boundaries between forest fragments and adjacent land. We studied the effect of fragmentation in terms of fragment size impact on overall plant species richness and on selected ecologically important groups' richness, composition, and diversity. We surveyed vegetation in the interior of 47 fragments of various sizes and one unfragmented reference forest. Our results reveal that the effect of fragmentation is complex and differs for studied plant groups. Decreasing fragment size negatively affects the overall plant richness and richness of native and ancient forest indicator plants as well as their diversity, while the effect is positive for alien plants. The highest proportion of ancient forest indicator plant species and the lowest proportion of alien plants in the unfragmented forest underline the great conservation value of forest fragments. At the same time, our results reveal that large and diverse forest ecosystems are susceptible to biological invasions as well.

Indexed as

diversityforest fragmenthabitat conservationhabitat modificationindicator plantsinvasion

Identifiers

PMID36501431
PMCPMC9738540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.