Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36501418›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Halina Ekiert, Marta Klimek-Szczykutowicz, Agnieszka Szopa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antioxidant 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Halina EkiertChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4887-4068
Marta Klimek-SzczykutowiczDepartment of Dermatology, Cosmetology and Aesthetic Surgery, The Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University, al. IX Wieków Kielc 19a, 25-516 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6901-1208
Agnieszka SzopaChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6351-4047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to perform a systematic review of scientific papers and an in-depth analysis of the latest research related to

Indexed as

cosmetic applicationsmoutanpaeoniflorinpaeonoltherapeutic effectstree peony

Identifiers

PMID36501418
PMCPMC9739549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.