Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Natalia N RudenkoInstitute of Basic Biological Problems, Federal Research Center «Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences» Pushchino, Moscow Region 142290, Russia.
Natalya V PermyakovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9291-1343
Lyudmila K IgnatovaInstitute of Basic Biological Problems, Federal Research Center «Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences» Pushchino, Moscow Region 142290, Russia.
Elena M NadeevaInstitute of Basic Biological Problems, Federal Research Center «Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences» Pushchino, Moscow Region 142290, Russia.
Alla A ZagorskayaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Elena V DeinekoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Boris N IvanovInstitute of Basic Biological Problems, Federal Research Center «Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences» Pushchino, Moscow Region 142290, Russia.
Institute of Basic Biological Problems · RUInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RU
Funding
The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, State Scientific Program 122041100186-2The Ministry of Science and Higher Education, the Budget Project FWNR-2022-0022
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The Role of Carbonic Anhydrase αCA4 in Photosynthetic Reactions in · full record | OpenQuestion